NETFLIX SYNOPSIS: Late one night in a Portland skate park, 16-year-old Alex (Gabe Nevins) accidentally kills a security guard and chooses to keep it a secret. Guilt begins to take its toll on his relationships with his friend Macy (Lauren McKinney), his girlfriend (Taylor Momsen) and eventually his sanity. Filmmaker Gus Van Sant directs this Cannes Film Festival 60th Anniversary Prize winner, based on the novel by Blake Nelson.
REVIEW: ***SPOILERS***
The story of Gus Van Sant’s Paranoid Park is that of a murder mystery, but the movie isn’t about that particular mystery. The actual mystery is what is going on inside the mind of the young murderer, Alex, and what he will do about his circumstances. Alex is a teen skateboarder who has killed a security guard in a bizarre accident while at a popular skating venue. The film ostensibly dissects the events that preceded and followed, but what it really dissects is Alex’s mind. In its way it’s a kind of psychological thriller, but unlike any you’ve ever seen.
The sequences of Alex’s memories of skating in the park are idealized, dreamlike, and are later contrasted starkly w/the shocking, horrific realism as he recalls the murder. Alex has met someone at the park who jumps the local trains and agrees to take him along. As they’re riding on the outside of one of the cars of the slow-moving train a security guard who has seen them runs up and begins hitting at him with his baton. Alex instinctively defends himself, almost casually striking out at the guard w/his skateboard, knocking him backwards and into the tracks of an oncoming train. Alex jumps from the car and runs back to see what has happened and like something out of a nightmare, the man has been literally cut in half, surviving long enough to crawl a few feet toward Alex w/only the upper half of his body, then dying.
Alex flees in shock to the unoccupied home of friend with whom he’s supposed to be staying for the night, strips off his clothes as if they’re contaminated and gets in the shower. Here Van Sant creates an extraordinarily graceful static image which he holds for an unusually long time in order to portray the state of Alex’s mind; Alex, deeply in shock, “zones out”, going numb, bowing his head under the shower head he becomes utterly still, the camera in extreme closeup while the water runs down his long hair hanging around and hiding his face. Out-of-focus, distorted, the wet clumped strands of his hair become like tentacles, he looks other-worldly, creature-like, even monstrous, and we know this is exactly how he feels at that moment in the deepest part of himself. It’s moving and disturbing; w/o a single word or overt gesture Van Sant lays bare the guilt and horror that this young man is experiencing. It’s a remarkable, beautiful image that stays w/one long after the movie is over.
That scene is also emblematic of the style of the whole film, Van Sant is telling his tale thru images that convey the character’s perception, not thru the words that he speaks to others, because it’s not about what happens but about what happens means to Alex. In the scene when he breaks up with his girlfriend we only watch the argument, we can’t hear it and it doesn’t matter because Alex knew pretty much how it would go and what would be said. Instead, as we watch it replay in his mind there is bittersweet music on the soundtrack, just as Alex might imagine it.
PP is shot in a highly stylized manner yet the acting is naturalistic, minimalist. Alex never has a “Big Scene” where he expresses his anguish, there are no histrionics. In fact a less-perceptive viewer might thing he hardly reacts at all, but they’d be wrong. Alex exists in a state of shock, he’s bewildered, he simply can’t comprehend his situation or what he should do about it. The film is told chronologically out of order as Alex tries to sort out what happened, reflecting this confusion.
PP could probably be said to be about many things, but I think the central theme is guilt and the conflict w/self-preservation. Alex needs to confess to someone, and starts to do so many times, then backs off. It means giving up his life for a tragic accident, something that could happen to anyone in a thousand different ways. Van Sant presents this dilemma but does not resolve it. Indeed, at the end we learn the whole film has been a confession, yet Alex’s final act is to destroy it, which is ambiguous. Is he destroying his life, since confessing would be much better for him than getting caught (which the film makes clear may very well happen) or is he saving it? And if the latter, at what cost to himself?
4 stars
Harold

This is a decent hero action-adventure flick. Always fun to watch, although there are at least 2 scenes that have me closing my eyes (and I forgot about the one and was EEEEWWWWWWWing for a good 5 minutes. hehehe)